Sunday, April 5, 2015

Alien FAQ: 6 questions about strange cosmic radio bursts

Alien FAQ: 6 questions about strange cosmic radio bursts:



The truth is out there (Image: Universal/Everett/REX)

A report that bursts of radio waves from the distant universe exhibit a weird mathematical pattern have freshly raised hopes that ET might be signalling us. But what's really behind it? Here's our ET FAQ.

1. Is this the first time we think we might have found aliens?
Nope, there have been several false alarms. The most famous is the 72-second Wow! signal, so called because an eager astronomer wrote "Wow!" next to it on a printout from the Ohio State Big Ear Telescope in 1977. It didn't seem to be of this Earth, but it was never seen again.

A few years before that, astronomer Jocelyn Bell thought she may have found the beep-beep-beep of "little green men" when she had actually discovered pulsars, the rapidly rotating corpses of stars that sweep a lighthouse-like beam of radiation as they spin. In the 70s, astronomers thought a Citizen's Band radio could be ET, and flagged the SOHO satellite as a possible signal in the 90s. But their double, triple and quadruple-checking rules meant they found the real culprits before making any announcements.

SETI software now weeds out false alarms pretty fast on its own, and there haven't been any major maybes in more than a decade – until now, perhaps.

2. Could the bursts have natural causes?
Fast radio bursts could have a natural, rather than an artificial, flavour. If a star in our galaxy had a massive flare-up, and the radiation had to tunnel through a bunch of cast-off plasma, the signal could look like it came from much farther away.

Also, if two white dwarf stars – the kind of dead sphere our sun will turn into in a few million years – crash into each other, they explode in a supernova. That blast could release a fast radio burst.

Then there are neutron stars. If two neutron stars – the dense cores of collapsed stars – are about to collide, they might release a radio burst right before they violently merge into one. Alternatively, some neutron stars are so massive that they should have collapsed into black holes, but are rotating too fast to do so. If one of these slows down, it will finally form a black hole, maybe blasting out a burst before it disappears forever.

Still, these don't account for the fast radio bursts' pattern according to any physics we know now.

3. How will we figure out if the creepy pattern is real or not?
First, scientists will have to discover more bursts using lots of different telescopes. Based on how much of the sky telescopes stared at and for how long before we found the 10 known bursts, scientists estimate that 10,000 bursts happen every day. Watching the whole sky all the time we'd catch every one of them, but right now we make discoveries when a scope happens to be pointed at the right place at the right time.

Either these new bursts will fit within the same pattern, adding to the eeriness, or they won't. If not, case closed. But, assuming they match up, we can see if they fit any earthly patterns, like appearing at the same parts of the day-night cycle or aligned with our seconds or minutes, which might imply an earthly origin. This may already be throwing some water on the discovery: the researchers published an update on 30 March suggesting that the signals might arrive according to UTC times, which aliens are unlikely to know about.

4. If it's really a signal from ET, how will we know what they're saying?
Google Translate! Just kidding. For the bursts we've already seen, we'll have to dig around in the existing data – which tells us how strong the radio waves were, at which frequencies, at what times – and see if anything is encoded besides 187.5. In the future, we could try to record more information about the bursts, to see if extra signals are embedded.

Some SETI scientists think it could take us centuries to decode any message we received. We won't have a common language, a common culture, or even common sensory organs. For a while, we may have to be happy to assume they're just saying "Hello!"

5. How else can we find ET?
Rogue radio broadcasts are the traditional signs astronomers look for from aliens – basically because these are the easiest to spot - and specifically, those from known exoplanet systems. The Allen Telescope Array currently does this sort of work from northern California. But search options expand as our technology gets better. As astronomer Jill Tarter is fond of saying, "SETI scientists always reserve the right to get smarter."

We could also look for signs of atmospheric and light pollution on other planets, to see if ET is as environmentally unfriendly as we are. We can look for ultrafast laser pulses that, as far as we know, the universe doesn't create naturally, but which humans – and perhaps aliens – can generate. And aliens who harness their star's energy in a super-evolved version of solar panels called a Dyson sphere would leave a heat signature we could see from far away.

6. What is the most likely explanation?
The only thing we know for sure about fast radio bursts – and this potential pattern – is that they're telling us we don't understand something about the universe. Maybe what we don't understand is that we have cosmic cousins. But more likely, we're missing something fundamental about how pulsars work or what our own satellites are doing. Either we'll learn something about physics, or we'll learn something about interstellar biology. It's win-win.

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Posted by Nelio Inacio at 2:09 PM
Labels: , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)