Thursday, December 17, 2015

The Horsehead Nebula

The Horsehead Nebula:

Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.

2015 December 16



See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.
Explanation: The Horsehead Nebula is one of the most famous nebulae on the sky. It is visible as the dark indentation to the red emission nebula in the center of the above photograph. The horse-head feature is dark because it is really an opaque dust cloud that lies in front of the bright red emission nebula. Like clouds in Earth's atmosphere, this cosmic cloud has assumed a recognizable shape by chance. After many thousands of years, the internal motions of the cloud will surely alter its appearance. The emission nebula's red color is caused by electrons recombining with protons to form hydrogen atoms. On the image left is the Flame Nebula, an orange-tinged nebula that also contains filaments of dark dust. Just to the lower left of the Horsehead nebula featured picture is a blueish reflection nebulae that preferentially reflects the blue light from nearby stars.

Wednesday, December 16, 2015

What Are The Parts Of An Atom?

What Are The Parts Of An Atom?:



A depiction of the atomic structure of the helium atom. Credit: Creative Commons


Since the beginning of time, human beings have sought to understand what the universe and everything within it is made up of. And while ancient magi and philosophers conceived of a world composed of four or five elements - earth, air, water, fire (and metal, or consciousness) - by classical antiquity, philosophers began to theorize that all matter was actually made up of tiny, invisible, and indivisible atoms.

Since that time, scientists have engaged in a process of ongoing discovery with the atom, hoping to discover its true nature and makeup. By the 20th century, our understanding became refined to the point that we were able to construct an accurate model of it. And within the past decade, our understanding has advanced even further, to the point that we have come to confirm the existence of almost all of its theorized parts.

Today, atomic research is focused on studying the structure and the function of matter at the subatomic level. This not only consists of identifying all the subatomic particles that are thought to make up an atom, but investigating the forces that govern them. These include strong nuclear forces, weak nuclear forces, electromagnetism and gravity. Here is a breakdown of all that we've come to learn about the atom so far...

Structure:
Our current model of the atom can be broken down into three constituents parts - protons, neutron, and electrons. Each of these parts has an associated charge, with protons carrying a positive charge, electrons having a negative charge, and neutrons possessing no net charge. In accordance with the Standard Model of particle physics, protons and neutrons make up the nucleus of the atom, while electrons orbit it in a "cloud".



The electrons in an atom are attracted to the protons in the nucleus by the electromagnetic force. Electrons can escape from their orbit, but only in response to an external source of energy being applied. The closer orbit of the electron to the nucleus, the greater the attractive force; hence, the stronger the external force needed to cause an electron to escape.

Electrons orbit the nucleus in multiple orbits, each of which corresponds to a particular energy level of the electron. The electron can change its state to a higher energy level by absorbing a photon with sufficient energy to boost it into the new quantum state. Likewise, an electron in a higher energy state can drop to a lower energy state while radiating the excess energy as a photon.

Atoms are electrically neutral if they have an equal number of protons and electrons. Atoms that have either a deficit or a surplus of electrons are called ions. Electrons that are farthest from the nucleus may be transferred to other nearby atoms or shared between atoms. By this mechanism, atoms are able to bond into molecules and other types of chemical compounds.

All three of these subatomic particles are Fermions, a class of particle associated with matter that is either elementary (electrons) or composite (protons and neutrons) in nature. This means that electrons have no known internal structure, whereas protons and neutrons are made up of other subatomic particles. called quarks. There are two types of quarks in atoms, which have a fractional electric charge.

Protons are composed of two "up" quarks (each with a charge of +2/3) and one "down" quark (-1/3), while neutrons consist of one up quark and two down quarks. This distinction accounts for the difference in charge between the two particles, which works out to a charge of +1 and 0 respectively, while electrons have a charge of -1.

Other subatomic particles include Leptons, which combine with Fermions to form the building blocks of matter. There are six leptons in the present atomic model: the electron, muon, and tau particles, and their associated neutrinos. The different varieties of the Lepton particles, commonly called "flavors", are differentiated by their sizes and charges, which effects the level of their electromagnetic interactions.

Then, there are Gauge Bosons, which are known as "force carriers" since they mediate physical forces. For instance, gluons are responsible for the strong nuclear force that holds quarks together while W and Z bosons (still hypothetical) are believed to be responsible for the weak nuclear force behind electromagnetism. Photons are the elementary particle that makes up light, while the Higgs Boson is responsible for giving the W and Z bosons their mass.

Mass:
The majority of an atoms' mass comes from the protons and neutrons that make up its nucleus. Electrons are the least massive of an atom's constituent particles, with a mass of 9.11 x 10-31 kg and a size too small to be measured by current techniques. Protons have a mass that is 1,836 times that of the electron, at 1.6726×10-27 kg, while neutrons are the most massive of the three, at 1.6929×10-27 kg (1,839 times the mass of the electron).



The total number of protons and neutrons in an atoms' nucleus (called "nucleons") is called the mass number. For example, the element Carbon-12 is so-named because it has a mass number of 12 - derived from its 12 nucleons (six protons and six neutrons). However, elements are also arranged based on their atomic numbers, which is the same as the number of protons found in the nucleus. In this case, Carbon has an atomic number of 6.

The actual mass of an atom at rest is very difficult to measure, as even the most massive of atoms are too light to express in conventional units. As such, scientists often use the unified atomic mass unit (u) - also called dalton (Da) - which is defined as a twelfth of the mass of a free neutral atom of carbon-12, which is approximately 1.66×10-27 kg.

Chemists also use moles, a unit defined as one mole of any element always having the same number of atoms (about 6.022×1023). This number was chosen so that if an element has an atomic mass of 1 u, a mole of atoms of that element has a mass close to one gram. Because of the definition of the unified atomic mass unit, each carbon-12 atom has an atomic mass of exactly 12 u, and so a mole of carbon-12 atoms weighs exactly 0.012 kg.

Radioactive Decay:
Any two atoms that have the same number of protons belong to the same chemical element. But atoms with an equal number of protons can have a different number of neutrons, which are defined as being different isotopes of the same element. These isotopes are often unstable, and all those with an atomic number greater than 82 are known to be radioactive.



When an element undergoes decay, its nucleus loses energy by emitting radiation - which can consist of alpha particles (helium atoms), beta particles (positrons), gamma rays (high-frequency electromagnetic energy) and conversion electrons. The rate at which an unstable element decays is known as its "half-life", which is the amount of time required for the element to fall to half its initial value.

The stability of an isotope is affected by the ratio of protons to neutrons. Of the 339 different types of elements that occur naturally on Earth, 254 (about 75%) have been labelled as "stable isotopes" - i.e. not subject to decay. An additional 34 radioactive elements have half-lives longer than 80 million years, and have also been in existence since the early Solar System (hence why they are called "primordial elements").

Finally, an additional 51 short-lived elements are known to occur naturally, as "daughter elements" (i.e. nuclear by-products) of the decay of other elements (such as radium from uranium). In addition, short-lived radioactive elements can be the result of natural energetic processes on Earth, such as cosmic ray bombardment (for example, carbon-14, which occurs in our atmosphere).

History of Study:
The earliest known examples of atomic theory come from ancient Greece and India, where philosophers such as Democritus postulated that all matter was composed of tiny, indivisible and indestructible units. The term "atom" was coined in ancient Greece and gave rise to the school of thought known as "atomism". However, this theory was more of a philosophical concept than a scientific one.



It was not until the 19th century that the theory of atoms became articulated as a scientific matter, with the first evidence-based experiments being conducted. For example, in the early 1800's, English scientist John Dalton used the concept of the atom to explain why chemical elements reacted in certain observable and predictable ways.

Dalton began with the question of why elements reacted in ratios of small whole numbers, and concluded that these reactions occurred in whole number multiples of discrete units—in other words, atoms. Through a series of experiments involving gases, Dalton went on to developed what is known as Dalton's Atomic Theory, which remains one of the cornerstones of modern physics and chemistry.

The theory comes down to five premises: elements, in their purest state, consist of particles called atoms; atoms of a specific element are all the same, down to the very last atom; atoms of different elements can be told apart by their atomic weights; atoms of elements unite to form chemical compounds; atoms can neither be created or destroyed in chemical reaction, only the grouping ever changes.

By the late 19th century, scientists began to theorize that the atom was made up of more than one fundamental unit. However, most scientists ventured that this unit would be the size of the smallest known atom - hydrogen. And then in 1897, through a series of experiments using cathode rays, physicist J.J. Thompson announced that he had discovered a unit that was 1000 times smaller and 1800 times lighter than a hydrogen atom.



His experiments also showed that they were identical to particles given off by the photoelectric effect and by radioactive materials. Subsequent experiments revealed that this particle carried electric current through metal wires and negative electric charges within atoms. Hence why the particle - which was originally named a "corpuscle" - was later changed to "electron", after the particle George Johnstone Stoney's predicted in 1874.

However, Thomson also postulated that electrons were distributed throughout the atom, which was a uniform sea of positive charge. This became known as the "plum pudding model", which would later be proven wrong. This took place in 1909, when physicists Hans Gieger and Ernest Marsden (under the direction of Ernest Rutherfod) conducted their experiment using metal foil and alpha particles.

Consistent with Dalton's atomic model, they believed that the alpha particles would pass straight through the foil with little deflection. However, many of the particles were deflected at angles greater than 90°. To explain this, Rutherford proposed that the positive charge of the atom is concentrated in a tiny nucleus at the center.

In 1913, physicist Niels Bohr proposed a model where electrons orbited the nucleus, but could only do so in a finite set of orbits. He also proposed that electrons could jump between orbits, but only in discrete changes of energy corresponding to the absorption or radiation of a photon. This not only refined Rutherford's proposed model, but also gave rise to the concept of a quantized atom, where matter behaved in discreet packets.



The development of the mass spectrometer - which uses a magnet to bend the trajectory of a beam of ions - allowed the mass of atoms to be measured with increased accuracy. Chemist Francis William Aston used this instrument to show that isotopes had different masses. This in turn was followed up by physicist James Chadwick, who in 1932 proposed the neutron as a way of explaining the existence of isotopes.

Throughout the early 20th century, the quantum nature of atoms was developed further. In 1922, German physicists Otto Stern and Walther Gerlach conducted an experiment where a beam of silver atoms was directed through a magnetic field, which was intended to split the beam between the direction of the atoms angular momentum (or spin).

Known as the Stern–Gerlach Experiment, the results was that the beam split in two parts, depending on whether or not the spin of the atoms was oriented up or down. In 1926, physicist Erwin Schrodinger used the idea of particles behaving like waves to develop a mathematical model that described electrons as three-dimensional waveforms rather than mere particles.

A consequence of using waveforms to describe particles is that it is mathematically impossible to obtain precise values for both the position and momentum of a particle at any given time. That same year, Werner Heisenberg formulated this problem and called it the "uncertainty principle". According to Heisenberg, for a given accurate measurement of position, one can only obtain a range of probable values for momentum, and vice versa.



In the 1930s, physicists discovered nuclear fission, thanks to the experiments of Otto Hahn, Lise Meitner and Otto Frisch. Hahn's experiments involved directing neutrons onto uranium atoms in the hopes of creating a transuranium element. Instead, the process turned his sample of uranium-92 (Ur92) into two new elements - barium (B56) and krypton (Kr27).

Meitner and Frisch verified the experiment and attributed it to the uranium atoms splitting to form two element with the same total atomic weight, a process which also released a considerable amount of energy by breaking the atomic bonds. In the years that followed, research into the possible weaponization of this process began (i.e. nuclear weapons) and led to the construction of the first atomic bombs in the US by 1945.

In the 1950s, the development of improved particle accelerators and particle detectors allowed scientists to study the impacts of atoms moving at high energies. From this, the Standard Model of particle physics was developed, which has so far successfully explained the properties of the nucleus, the existence of theorized subatomic particles, and the forces that govern their interactions.

Modern Experiments:
Since the latter half of the 20th century, many new and exciting discoveries have been with regards to atomic theory and quantum mechanics. For example, in 2012, the long search for the Higgs Boson led to a breakthrough where researchers working at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Switzerland announced its discovery.



In recent decades, a great deal of time and energy has been dedicated by physicists to the development of a unified field theory (aka. Grand Unifying Theory or Theory of Everything). In essence, since the Standard Model was first proposed, scientists have sought to understand how the four fundamental forces of the universe (gravity, strong and weak nuclear forces, and electromagnetism) work together.

Whereas gravity can be understood using Einstein's theories of relativity, and nuclear forces and electromagnetism can be understood using quantum theory, neither theory can account for all four forces working together. Attempts to resolve this have led to a number of proposed theories over the years, ranging from String Theory to Loop Quantum Gravity. To date, none of these theories have led to a breakthrough.

Our understanding of the atom has come a long way, from classical models that saw it as an inert solid that interacted with other atoms mechanically, to modern theories where atoms are composed of energetic particles that behave unpredictably. While it has taken several thousand years, our knowledge of the fundamental structure of all matter has advanced considerably.

And yet, there remain many mysteries that are yet to be resolved. With time and continued efforts, we may finally unlock the last remaining secrets of the atom. Then again, it could very well be that any new discoveries we make will only give rise to more questions - and they could be even more confounding than the ones that came before!

We have written many articles about the atom for Universe Today. Here's an article about John Dalton's atomic model, Neils Bohr's atomic model, Who Was Democritus?, and How Many Atoms Are There In The Universe?

If you'd like more info on the atom, check out NASA's Article on Analyzing Tiny Samples, and here's a link to NASA's Article about Atoms, Elements, and Isotopes.

We've also recorded an entire episode of Astronomy Cast all about the Atom. Listen here, Episode 164: Inside the Atom, Episode 263: Radioactive Decay, and Episode 394: The Standard Model, Bosons.


Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Venus From the International Space Station

Venus From the International Space Station: On Dec. 5, 2015, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) astronaut Kimiya Yui captured this image from the International Space Station of the planet Venus. Part of the station's Kibo laboratory is visible at the top of the frame. At the time this photograph was taken, Japan's Akatsuki spacecraft, a Venus climate orbiter, was nearing the planet.


Original enclosures:


The Pelican Nebula in Gas Dust and Stars

The Pelican Nebula in Gas Dust and Stars: APOD: 2015 November 17 - The Pelican Nebula in Gas Dust and Stars



Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.


2015 November 17


See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.



The Pelican Nebula in Gas, Dust, and Stars
Image Credit & Copyright: Roberto Colombari
Explanation: The Pelican Nebula is slowly being transformed. IC 5070, the official designation, is divided from the larger North America Nebula by a molecular cloud filled with dark dust. The Pelican, however, receives much study because it is a particularly active mix of star formation and evolving gas clouds. The featured picture was produced in three specific colors -- light emitted by sulfur, hydrogen, and oxygen -- that can help us to better understand these interactions. The light from young energetic stars is slowly transforming the cold gas to hot gas, with the advancing boundary between the two, known as an ionization front, visible in bright orange on the right. Particularly dense tentacles of cold gas remain. Millions of years from now this nebula might no longer be known as the Pelican, as the balance and placement of stars and gas will surely leave something that appears completely different.

Yearly Astronomy Review: APOD editor to speak in January in Philadelphia and New York City
Tomorrow's picture: sudden jet

< | Archive | Submissions | Index | Search | Calendar | RSS | Education | About APOD | Discuss | >

Authors & editors: Robert Nemiroff (MTU) & Jerry Bonnell (UMCP)
NASA Official: Phillip Newman Specific rights apply.
NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices
A service of: ASD at NASA / GSFC
& Michigan Tech. U.


Centaurus A

Centaurus A: APOD: 2015 November 19 - Centaurus A



Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.


2015 November 19


See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.



Centaurus A
Processing & Copyright: Robert Gendler, Roberto Colombari
Image Data: Hubble Space Telescope, European Southern Observatory
Explanation: What's the closest active galaxy to planet Earth? That would be Centaurus A, only 11 million light-years distant. Spanning over 60,000 light-years, the peculiar elliptical galaxy is also known as NGC 5128. Forged in a collision of two otherwise normal galaxies, Centaurus A's fantastic jumble of young blue star clusters, pinkish star forming regions, and imposing dark dust lanes are seen here in remarkable detail. The colorful galaxy portrait is a composite of image data from space- and ground-based telescopes large and small. Near the galaxy's center, left over cosmic debris is steadily being consumed by a central black hole with a billion times the mass of the Sun. As in other active galaxies, that process generates the radio, X-ray, and gamma-ray energy radiated by Centaurus A.

Tomorrow's picture: selfie with friends

< | Archive | Submissions | Search | Calendar | RSS | Education | About APOD | Discuss | >

Authors & editors: Robert Nemiroff (MTU) & Jerry Bonnell (UMCP)
NASA Official: Phillip Newman Specific rights apply.
NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices
A service of: ASD at NASA / GSFC
& Michigan Tech. U.


Leonids and Friends

Leonids and Friends: APOD: 2015 November 20 - Leonids and Friends



Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.


2015 November 20


See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.



Leonids and Friends
Image Credit & Copyright: Malcolm Park (North York Astronomical Association)
Explanation: Leonid meteors rained down on planet Earth this week, the annual shower of dusty debris from the orbit of Comet 55P/Tempel-Tuttle. Leonids streak through this composite night skyview from a backyard observatory in southern Ontario. Recorded with camera fixed to a tripod, the individual frames capture the bright meteor activity throughout the night of November 16/17, about a day before the shower's very modest peak. The frames are registered to the fixed field of view, so the meteor trails are not all aligned to the background star field recorded that same evening when nebula-rich Orion stood above the southern horizon. As a result, the trails don't appear to point back to the shower's radiant in Leo, situated off the left edge of the star field frame. In fact, some trails could be of Taurid meteors, a shower also active in November, or even sporadic meteors, including a bright fireball with its reflection near the horizon.

Tomorrow's picture: Intergalactic Saturday

< | Archive | Submissions | Search | Calendar | RSS | Education | About APOD | Discuss | >

Authors & editors: Robert Nemiroff (MTU) & Jerry Bonnell (UMCP)
NASA Official: Phillip Newman Specific rights apply.
NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices
A service of: ASD at NASA / GSFC
& Michigan Tech. U.


Recycling NGC 5291

Recycling NGC 5291: APOD: 2015 November 21 - Recycling NGC 5291



Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.


2015 November 21


See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.



Recycling NGC 5291
Image Credit & Copyright: CHART32 Team, Processing - Johannes Schedler
Explanation: Following an ancient galaxy-galaxy collision 200 million light-years from Earth, debris from a gas-rich galaxy, NGC 5291, was flung far into intergalactic space. NGC 5291 and the likely interloper, also known as the "Seashell" galaxy, are captured near the center of this spectacular scene. The sharp, ground-based telescopic image looks toward the galaxy cluster Abell 3574 in the southern constellation Centaurus. Stretched along the 100,000 light-year long tidal tails, are clumps resembling dwarf galaxies, but lacking old stars, apparently dominated by young stars and active star forming regions. Found to be unusually rich in elements heavier than hydrogen and helium, the dwarf galaxies were likely born in intergalactic space, recycling the enriched debris from NGC 5291 itself.

Tomorrow's picture: doomed moon

< | Archive | Submissions | Search | Calendar | RSS | Education | About APOD | Discuss | >

Authors & editors: Robert Nemiroff (MTU) & Jerry Bonnell (UMCP)
NASA Official: Phillip Newman Specific rights apply.
NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices
A service of: ASD at NASA / GSFC
& Michigan Tech. U.


Phobos: Doomed Moon of Mars

Phobos: Doomed Moon of Mars: APOD: 2015 November 22 - Phobos: Doomed Moon of Mars



Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.


2015 November 22


See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.



Phobos: Doomed Moon of Mars
Image Credit: HiRISE, MRO, LPL (U. Arizona), NASA
Explanation: This moon is doomed. Mars, the red planet named for the Roman god of war, has two tiny moons, Phobos and Deimos, whose names are derived from the Greek for Fear and Panic. These martian moons may well be captured asteroids originating in the main asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter or perhaps from even more distant reaches of the Solar System. The larger moon, Phobos, is indeed seen to be a cratered, asteroid-like object in this stunning color image from the robotic Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, recorded at a resolution of about seven meters per pixel. But Phobos orbits so close to Mars - about 5,800 kilometers above the surface compared to 400,000 kilometers for our Moon - that gravitational tidal forces are dragging it down. A recent analysis of the long grooves indicates that they may result from global stretching caused by tides -- the differing force of Mars' gravity on different sides of Phobos. These grooves may then be an early phase in the disintegration of Phobos into a ring of debris around Mars.

Follow APOD on: Facebook, Google Plus, or Twitter
Tomorrow's picture: orion in 212 hours

< | Archive | Submissions | Index | Search | Calendar | RSS | Education | About APOD | Discuss | >

Authors & editors: Robert Nemiroff (MTU) & Jerry Bonnell (UMCP)
NASA Official: Phillip Newman Specific rights apply.
NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices
A service of: ASD at NASA / GSFC
& Michigan Tech. U.


Aurora over Clouds

Aurora over Clouds: APOD: 2015 November 24 - Aurora over Clouds



Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.


2015 November 24


See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.



Aurora over Clouds
Image Credit & Copyright: Daniele Boffelli
Explanation: Auroras usually occur high above the clouds. The auroral glow is created when fast-moving particles ejected from the Sun impact the Earth's magnetosphere, from which charged particles spiral along the Earth's magnetic field to strike atoms and molecules high in the Earth's atmosphere. An oxygen atom, for example, will glow in the green light commonly emitted by an aurora after being energized by such a collision. The lowest part of an aurora will typically occur at 100 kilometers up, while most clouds usually exist only below about 10 kilometers. The relative heights of clouds and auroras are shown clearly in the featured picture from Dyrholaey, Iceland. There, a determined astrophotographer withstood high winds and initially overcast skies in an attempt to capture aurora over a picturesque lighthouse, only to take, by chance, the featured picture along the way.

Tomorrow's picture: pluto's pits

< | Archive | Submissions | Index | Search | Calendar | RSS | Education | About APOD | Discuss | >

Authors & editors: Robert Nemiroff (MTU) & Jerry Bonnell (UMCP)
NASA Official: Phillip Newman Specific rights apply.
NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices
A service of: ASD at NASA / GSFC
& Michigan Tech. U.


Catch This Season’s ‘Other’ Comet: S2 PanSTARRS

Catch This Season’s ‘Other’ Comet: S2 PanSTARRS:



Comet C/2014 S2 PanSTARRS, imaged on October 10th, 2015. Image credit and copyright: Tom Wildoner


Now is the time to catch binocular Comet C/2014 S2 PanSTARRS, as it tops +8 magnitude ahead of predictions this month and crosses circumpolar northern skies. Will this Christmas comet stay bright post-perihelion, rivaling other comets into early 2016? 

How 'bout Comet C/2013 US10 Catalina, huh? The comet took center stage early this month, as it broke +7 magnitude in brightness, experienced a tail disconnection event, and grouped with Venus and the waning crescent Moon in the dawn sky.

Expect comet US10 Catalina to remain a fine binocular object kicking off 2016, reminiscent of the binocular comet C/2014 Q2 Lovejoy from just this past winter. But there's another comet for northern hemisphere residents currently performing above expectations. Comet C/2014 S2 PanSTARRS is the comet you most likely aren't watching, but should be. The comet has recently brightened ahead of expectations to +8th magnitude, and may top out in the coming weeks at +7th magnitude post-perihelion.



Comet S2 PanSTARRS reached perihelion 2.1 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun just last week on December 9th, 2015. Discovered on September 22nd, 2014 by the prolific PanSTARRS 1 survey based atop mount Haleakala on Maui in Hawaii, S2 PanSTARRS is on an estimated 2,217 year orbit, inclined at a steep angle of 65 degrees relative to the ecliptic and the general plane of the solar system. This makes for its current residency in the realm of the northern celestial pole, and the comet remains circumpolar above latitude 30 degrees north for the duration of this apparition, crossing for the constellation Draco in late 2015 into the constellation Ursa Minor in early 2016.

We get a handful of binocular comets each year, faint fuzzies looking like unresolved globular clusters. Such a passage would've went unrecorded in pre-telescopic times, and hunting for comets the likes of S2 PanSTARRS partly inspired Charles Messier to make his first and famous deep sky catalog, marking the celestial skies for comet hunters as if to say 'here be cometary impostors...'



But Comet S2 PanSTARRS won't stay bright for long.

Here's the run down over the next few months of key astronomical dates with destiny for this fleeting comet. The Full and New Moon phases are also denoted, marking weeks favoring dark vs light-polluted skies.



-December 25th: The Moon reaches Full.

-December 31st: Stationary in its apparent motion, before appearing to reverse direction to the northeast.



-January 1st: Tops out in brightness at +7th mag?

-January 10th: New Moon.

-January 22nd: 20 degrees from Comet C/2013 US10 Catalina crossing through the constellation Draco.

-January 24th: Passes less than one degree from the +4.8 magnitude star 18 Draconis.

-January 24th: Full Moon.

-February 8th: New Moon.

-February 20th: Passes into the constellation Ursa Minor.

-February 22nd: Full Moon.

-February 27th: Closest Earth approach, at 1.83 AU distant. Moving at a maximum apparent speed of 30' (half a degree, about the angular size of a Full Moon) per day.

-February 27th: Passes just over one degree from the +3 magnitude star Pherkad (Gamma Ursae Minoris).

-February 29th: Reaches its most northerly point, at a declination 71 degrees north, just 19 degrees from the northern celestial pole.

-March 1: Drops back below +10 magnitude?

-March 9th: New Moon.

-March 18th: Crosses back into the constellation Draco.

The best time to catch Comet S2 PanSTARRS over the next few months is in the early morning hours. From latitude 30 north, the comet sits 23 degrees above the NNE horizon around 5AM local on Christmas Day; the farther north you go, the higher the comet will be above the horizon.



In binoculars or a small telescope, expect comet S2 PanSTARRS to appear as a fuzzy indistinct 'star,' which stubbornly refuses to snap into focus, like an unresolved globular. I would show off S2 PanSTARRS at a public star party under dark skies. When it comes to comets, brighter +10th magnitude triggers our 'is interesting, worthy of note for skilled observers' alarm.

A caveat is in order; expect any given comet to appear visually fainter than a star of the same quoted brightness. As with deep sky objects, said brightness is smeared out over the expanse of the comet, giving it an overall lower surface brightness appearance for the viewer.



And now for the wow factor: the last time comet S2 PanSTARRS passed Earth in the 3rd century BC, Carthage was battling an upstart Rome during the first Punic Wars. The comet very likely passed through the inner solar system unnoticed and unrecorded, as it was never a naked eye object. The comet's next pass through the inner solar system is out around 4232 AD, give or take a year...

Along with US10 Catalina and comet 2013 X1 PanSTARRS, expect S2 PanSTARRS to join the ranks of binocular 2016 comets... more to come on that soon.

Remember, the next 'Great Comet' could swing through the inner solar system at any time... and we're definitely due!



  • CASA DE ORAÇÃO - Esta determinado que o mal saia de nossas vidas e recebamos as bênçãos do Senhor !

The Great Orion Nebula M42

The Great Orion Nebula M42:

Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.

2015 November 4


See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.
Explanation: The Great Nebula in Orion, also known as M42, is one of the most famous nebulas in the sky. The star forming region's glowing gas clouds and hot young stars are on the right in this sharp and colorful image that includes the bluish reflection nebulae NGC 1977 and friends on the left. Located at the edge of an otherwise invisible giant molecular cloud complex, these eye-catching nebulas represent only a small fraction of this galactic neighborhood's wealth of interstellar material. Within the well-studied stellar nursery, astronomers have also identified what appear to be numerous infant planetary systems. The gorgeous skyscape spans nearly two degrees or about 45 light-years at the Orion Nebula's estimated distance of 1,500 light-years.

Enceladus: Ringside Water World

Enceladus: Ringside Water World: APOD: 2015 December 3 - Enceladus: Ringside Water World



Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.


2015 December 3


See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.



Enceladus: Ringside Water World
Image Credit: Cassini Imaging Team, SSI, JPL, ESA, NASA
Explanation: Saturn's icy moon Enceladus poses above the gas giant's icy rings in this Cassini spacecraft image. The dramatic scene was captured on July 29, while Cassini cruised just below the ring plane, its cameras looking back in a nearly sunward direction about 1 million kilometers from the moon's bright crescent. At 500 kilometers in diameter, Enceladus is a surprisingly active moon though, its remarkable south polar geysers are visible venting beyond a dark southern limb. In fact, data collected during Cassini's flybys and years of images have recently revealed the presence of a global ocean of liquid water beneath this moon's icy crust. Demonstrating the tantalizing liquid layer's global extent, the careful analysis indicates surface and core are not rigidly connected, with Enceladus rocking slightly back and forth in its orbit.

Tomorrow's picture: bubble and crescent

< | Archive | Submissions | Search | Calendar | RSS | Education | About APOD | Discuss | >

Authors & editors: Robert Nemiroff (MTU) & Jerry Bonnell (UMCP)
NASA Official: Phillip Newman Specific rights apply.
NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices
A service of: ASD at NASA / GSFC
& Michigan Tech. U.


The Brightest Spot on Ceres

The Brightest Spot on Ceres: APOD: 2015 December 11 - The Brightest Spot on Ceres



Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.


2015 December 11


See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.



The Brightest Spot on Ceres
Image Credit: NASA, JPL-Caltech, UCLA, MPS/DLR/IDA
Explanation: Dwarf planet Ceres is the largest object in the Solar System's main asteroid belt with a diameter of about 950 kilometers. Exploring Ceres from orbit since March, the Dawn spacecraft's camera has revealed about 130 or so mysterious bright spots, mostly associated with impact craters scattered around the small world's otherwise dark surface. The brightest one is near the center of the 90 kilometer wide Occator Crater, seen in this dramatic false color view combining near-infrared and visible light image data. A study now finds the bright spot's reflected light properties are probably most consistent with a type of magnesium sulfate called hexahydrite. Of course, magnesium sulfate is also known to Earth dwellers as epsom salt. Haze reported inside Occator also suggests the salty material could be left over as a mix of salt and water-ice sublimates on the surface. Since impacts would have exposed the material, Ceres' numerous and widely scattered bright spots may indicate the presence of a subsurface shell of ice-salt mix. In mid-December, Dawn will begin taking observations from its closest Ceres mapping orbit.

Tomorrow's picture: light-weekend

< | Archive | Submissions | Search | Calendar | RSS | Education | About APOD | Discuss | >

Authors & editors: Robert Nemiroff (MTU) & Jerry Bonnell (UMCP)
NASA Official: Phillip Newman Specific rights apply.
NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices
A service of: ASD at NASA / GSFC
& Michigan Tech. U.


Comet Meets Moon and Morning Star

Comet Meets Moon and Morning Star: APOD: 2015 December 12 - Comet Meets Moon and Morning Star



Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.


2015 December 12


See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.



Comet Meets Moon and Morning Star
Image Credit & Copyright: Greg Hogan
Explanation: A crescent Moon and brilliant Venus met in predawn skies on December 7, a beautiful conjunction of planet Earth's two brightest celestial beacons after the Sun. Harder to see but also on the scene was Comet Catalina (C/2013 US10). The fainter comet clearly sporting two tails, lunar night side, bright sunlit lunar crescent, and brilliant morning star, are all recorded here by combining short and long exposures of the same field of view. Pointing down and right, Catalina's dust tail tends to trail behind the comet's orbit. Its ion tail, angled toward the top left of the frame, is blowing away from the Sun. Discovered in 2013, the new visitor from the Oort cloud was closest to the Sun on November 15 and is now outbound, headed for its closest approach to Earth in mid-January.

Watch: The Geminids
Tomorrow's picture: radiant meteor shower

< | Archive | Submissions | Search | Calendar | RSS | Education | About APOD | Discuss | >

Authors & editors: Robert Nemiroff (MTU) & Jerry Bonnell (UMCP)
NASA Official: Phillip Newman Specific rights apply.
NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices
A service of: ASD at NASA / GSFC
& Michigan Tech. U.


How Long is a Day on Mars?

How Long is a Day on Mars?:



Artist's conception of Mars, with asteroids nearby. Credit: NASA


Mars represents something of a conundrum for scientists. In many respects, it is significantly different from Earth. It's cold, it's dry, there is little  atmosphere or precipitation to speak of, and nothing grows there. By our standards, that makes it an incredibly inhospitable place. And yet, in many other respects, it is quite similar to our world.

For instance, Mars' internal structure is differentiated between a metallic core and a silicate mantle and crust. It also has plenty of water, though the majority of it is concentrated in the polar regions as water ice (and as a permanent layer of permafrost under much of the surface). But perhaps most striking of all, a day on Mars is almost the same as a day here on Earth.



In fact, a day on Mars is roughly 40 minutes longer than a day is here on Earth. Compared to other bodies in our Solar System where a day is either incredibly short (Jupiter's rotates once on its axis every 9 hours, 55 minutes and 29.69 seconds) or incredibly long (a day on Venus lasts for 116 days and 18 hours), this similarity is quite astounding.

However, there are some things that need to be addressed before we go about declaring just how long a day is on another planet. In fact, there are two ways to determine the length of a day on a celestial body, the sidereal day and the solar day; both of which are used by astronomers for determining the passage on time.

Sidereal vs. Solar:
By definition, a sidereal day on Mars is the length of time that it takes the planet to rotate once on its axis so that stars appear in the same place in the night sky. On Earth, this takes exactly 23 hours, 56 minutes and 4.1 seconds. In comparison, on Mars, a sidereal day lasts 24 hours, 37 minutes, and 22 seconds.

https://youtu.be/JJ6bKJEFDUY

The solar day, by contrast, is the time it takes for the Earth to rotate on its axis so that the Sun appears in the same position in the sky. This position changes slightly each day, but on Earth, a mean solar day works out to being 24 hours long. On Mars, a solar day lasts 24 hours, 39 minutes, and 35 seconds. Rounding that out, we say that a day here on Earth works out to an even 24 hours while on Mars, a day lasts 24 hours and 40 minutes.

Want to know about some other interesting similarities Mars has with Earth? Read on!

Seasonal Changes:
Mars also has a seasonal cycle that is similar to that of Earth's. This is due in part to the fact that Mars also has a tilted axis, which is inclined 25.19° to its orbital plane (compared to Earth's axial tilt of approx. 23.44°). It's also due to Mars orbital eccentricity, which mean that it ranges in distance from 206.7  million to 249.2 million kilometers from the Sun.

This change in distance causes significant variations in temperature. While the planet’s average temperature is -46 °C (51 °F), this ranges from a low of -143 °C (-225.4 °F) during the winter at the poles to a high of 35 °C (95 °F) during summer and midday at the equator. This high in temperatures is what allows for liquid water to still flow, albeit intermittently, on the surface of Mars.

It also snows on Mars. In 2008, NASA's Phoenix Lander found water ice in the polar regions of the planet. This was an expected finding, but scientists were not prepared to observe snow falling from clouds. The snow, combined with soil chemistry experiments, led scientists to believe that the landing site had a wetter and warmer climate in the past.



And then in 2012, data obtained by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter revealed that carbon-dioxide snowfalls occur in the southern polar region of Mars. For decades, scientists have known that carbon-dioxide ice is a permanent part of Mars’ seasonal cycle and exists in the southern polar caps. But this was the first time that such a phenomena was detected, and it remains the only known example of carbon-dioxide snow falling anywhere in our solar system.

In addition, recent surveys conducted by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, the Mars Science Laboratory, the Mars Orbiter Mission (MOM), the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution (MAVEN) and the Opportunity and Curiosity Rovers have revealed some startling things about Mars' deep past.

For starters, soil samples and orbital observation have demonstrated conclusively that roughly 3.7 billion years ago, the planet had more water on its surface than is currently in the Atlantic Ocean. Similarly, atmospheric studies conducted on the surface and from space have proven that Mars also had a viable atmosphere at that time, one which was slowly stripped away by solar wind.

Weather Patterns:
Like Earth, Mars can have some pretty extreme weather. In the Red Planet's case, this takes the form of dust storms that can dominated the surface from time to time. These storms have been known to grow to be thousands of kilometers across, occasionally encircling the entire planet and covering everything in a thick haze of dust. When these storms become that large, they prevent direct observation of the Martian surface.

https://youtu.be/ZBZz0R6Ym5E

Case in point: when the Mariner 9 orbiter became the first spacecraft to orbit Mars in 1971, it sent pictures back to Earth of a world consumed in haze. The entire planet was covered by a dust storm so massive that only Olympus Mons, the giant Martian volcano that measures 24 km high, could be seen above the clouds. This storm lasted for a full month, and delayed Mariner 9's attempts to photograph the planet in detail.

And then on June 9th, 2001, the Hubble Space Telescope spotted a dust storm in the Hellas Basin on Mars. By July, the storm had died down, but then grew again to become the largest storm in 25 years. So big was the storm that amateur astronomers using small telescopes were able to see it from Earth. And the cloud raised the temperature of the frigid Martian atmosphere by a stunning 30° Celsius.

Therein lies another thing Mars has in common with Earth - global warming! Much like warming trends here on Earth, warming on Mars is caused by the presence of particulate matter in the air that absorbs energy from the Sun and radiates it outward into the atmosphere. causing average temperatures to rise.

These storms tend to occur when Mars is closest to the Sun, and are the result of temperatures rising and triggering changes in the air and soil. As the soil dries, it becomes more easily picked up by air currents, which are caused by pressure changes due to increased heat. The dust storms cause temperatures to rise even further, so you could say Mars has a "greenhouse effect" of its own!

https://youtu.be/2Y5_wJwaEGc

As you have probably concluded from all the facts listed above, Mars can be a harsh and volatile planet. Just knowing the answer to ''how long is a day on Mars?'' only provides a small glimpse of what is going on there. At the end of the day (no pun intended!) there is plenty happening on Mars that makes it similar enough to Earth that many people are actually contemplating living there someday. And knowing exactly what sets Mars apart, and what we can work with, will be intrinsic to making that happen!

We have written many interesting articles about Mars here at Universe Today. Here's one about Mars Compared to Earth, the time it takes to get to Mars, how strong the gravity is on Mars, and how many moons Mars has.

Want more information? Learn about living on Mars time, which can you do by consulting NASA's clock for calculating Martian time.

Finally, if you'd like to learn more about Mars in general, Astronomy Cast has some episodes about the Red Planet, like Episode 52: Mars, and Episode 91: The Search for Water on Mars.