Thursday, May 12, 2016

Watch Mercury Race Across the Sun, Courtesy of the Big Bear Solar Observatory

Watch Mercury Race Across the Sun, Courtesy of the Big Bear Solar Observatory:



Mercury transit


Just. Wow.



Just when we thought we'd seen every amazing image and video sequence from Monday's transit of Mercury, a new one surfaces that makes our jaw hit the floor.



The folks at the Big Bear Solar Observatory may have just won the internet this week with this amazing high-definition view of Mercury racing across the surface of the Sun:







Remember, Mercury is tiny a world, just 1.4 times the diameter of our Moon, at 4,880 kilometers across. At about 9" arc seconds across during the transit, it took Mercury seven and a half hours to race across the 30' (over 180 times the apparent size of Mercury as seen from the Earth) disk of the Sun.



The video has an ethereal three dimensional quality to it, as we seem to race along with the fleeting world. You can see the granulation in the dazzling solar photosphere whiz by in the background.



Big Bear Solar Observatory Telescope Engineer and Chief Observer Claude Plymate explains some of the technical aspects of the captured sequence:



"John Varsik assembled (the video) from our speckle reconstructed broadband filter images. The images were taken with a high speed PCO2000 CCD camera. Bursts of 100 frames were taken at a cadence of 15 seconds. After flat fielding and dark subtraction, speckle reconstruction is used on each burst to generate the final single frame. Exposure time was 1.0 ms through a broadband TiO (7057A, 10A FWHM) filter. 
Our actual primary science data was data taken with a fast scanning spectrometer that very quickly produces 2D Na D-line maps. The objective was to measure the Na distribution in Mercury's exosphere in absorption."
So there's some science there as well, as measurements taken from Big Bear will make a fine comparison and contrast with NASA's measurements of the tenuous exosphere of Mercury measured by the MESSENGER spacecraft.
Based on the shores of Big Bear Lake in the San Bernardino Mountains 120 kilometers east of downtown Los Angeles, the Big Bear Solar Observatory employed the 1.6-meter New Solar Telescope (NST) to follow the transit. The NST is the largest clear aperture solar telescope in the world currently in use. Capable of resolving features on the Sun just 50 kilometers across, the mirror blank for the NST was figured at the Mirror Lab at the University of Arizona in Tucson and served as a proof of concept for the seven mirror Giant Magellan Telescope currently under construction.
The Big Bear Solar Observatory is managed under the New Jersey Institute of Technology and is funded by NASA, the United States Air Force and the National Science Foundation.
The Big Bear Solar Observatory is also part of the GONG (Global Oscillation Network Group), a series of observatories worldwide dedicated to observing the Sun around the clock. It's strange to think, but in a sense, we live inside the outer atmosphere of our host star, and knowing just what it's doing is of paramount importance to our modern technology-dependent civilization.
An awesome capture, with some amazing science to boot. Big Bear will also get a sunrise view of the November 11th, 2019 transit of Mercury as well:
Stay tuned!
Also check out Universe Today's Flickr forum for more amazing images of the transit of Mercury, and Nancy Atkinson's roundup of the view from the Solar Dynamics Observatory.
Video used with permission of the BBSO.



The BBSO operation is supported by NJIT, US NSF AGS-1250818, and NASA

NNX13AG14G grants, and the NST operation is partly supported by the Korea

Astronomy and Space Science Institute and Seoul National University and by

the strategic priority research program of CAS with Grant No.

XDB09000000".



The post Watch Mercury Race Across the Sun, Courtesy of the Big Bear Solar Observatory appeared first on Universe Today.

Monday, May 9, 2016

Images of Today’s Transit of Mercury From Around the World

Images of Today’s Transit of Mercury From Around the World:



Mercury Transit


(Note: Awesome images are being added as they come in!)



It's not every day you get to see a planet pass in front of the Sun.



But today, skywatchers worldwide got to see just that, as diminutive Mercury passed in front of the disk of the Sun as seen from the Earth. This was the first transit of Mercury across the face of the Sun since November 8th, 2006, and the last one until November 11th, 2019.







Public events worldwide put the unique spectacle on display. Transits of innermost Mercury are much more frequent than Venus, the only other planet that can cross between the Sun and the Earth. Venus transited the Sun for the second and last time for this century on June 5th-6th, 2012, not to do so again until 2117.







Unlike a transit of Earth-sized Venus, you needed safely-filtered optical assistance to see tiny Mercury today against the Sun. At about 9" arc seconds in size, you could stack over 180 Mercury's across the 30' arc minute disk of the Sun.







Lots of live feeds came to the rescue of those of us with cloudy skies, including Slooh, NASA, and our good friends at the Virtual Telescope project.







As is customary, we thought we'd feature a running blog of all of the great images as they trickle in to us here at Universe Today, throughout the day. This is one of our favorite things to do, as we show off some of the unique images as they trickle in from the field. Watch this space, as we'll most likely be dropping in new images today throughout the day through to tomorrow.







Unlike solar eclipses, which are only usually picked up by solar observing satellites in low Earth orbit, spacecraft with different vantage points in space tend to see transits of Venus and Mercury as well, albeit at slightly different times. We're expecting to see images from the joint NASA/ESA SOHO mission located at the L1 sunward point, as well as NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory, JAXA's Hinode, and ESA's Proba-2, all in orbit around the Earth.







It's amazing just how far the imaging tech has come, since the last transit of Mercury in 2006. Back then, Coronado hydrogen alpha 'scopes were the 'hot new thing' to observe the Sun with. Today, folks projected and shared the Sun safely with the world via social media online... and folks heeded our admonishment to stay cool and hydrate, and no reports of heat stroke from solar observers were noted.







Transits of Mercury occur on average about 13 times per century. The first was observed by Pierre Gassendi on November 7th, 1631. And although they have more of a purely aesthetic appeal than scientific value these days, transits of Mercury and Venus in past centuries were vital to pegging down the distance to the Sun via measuring the solar parallax, which in turn gave the scale of the solar system some hard numerical values in terms of the distance from the Earth to the Sun. Today, we know the solar parallax is tiny at a value of about 8.8", tinier than the disk of Mercury as seen against the Sun today.







Fun fact: a transit of Mercury as seen from space actually turns up in the 200- science fiction flick Sunshine... to our knowledge, a transit of Venus has yet to hit the big screen. We also made mention of Mercury transits and more unique astronomical events spanning space and time in our original scifi tale Exeligmos.







Ready for more transit weirdness? Journey to Mars in 2084, and you can witness a transit of the Earth, Moon AND the innermost Martian moon Phobos. Let's see, by then I'll be...







Looking further out, one can wonder just when Mercury and Venus will transit the Sun... at the same time. We came across an interesting paper this weekend on just this subject. Keep in mind, the paper notes that orbits of the planets become a bit uncertain the farther out in time you look.







Mark your calendars, as the next simultaneous transit of both Venus and Mercury occurs on September 17th, 13,425 AD. And hey, journey to Antarctica on July 5th, 6,757 AD and you can also witness a transit of Mercury during a partial solar eclipse;







Did anyone manage to catch a transit of the International Space Station during the Mercury transit? There were two good opportunities across North America today at 15:42 to 15:50 UT and 17:16 to 17:24 UT... a unique opportunity!







Well, it looks like the skies over southern Spain are clearing... time to set up our solar projection rig and observe the 2016 transit of Mercury for ourselves. Be sure to check this space for updates, and send those pics in to Universe Today's Flickr forum!

The post Images of Today’s Transit of Mercury From Around the World appeared first on Universe Today.

Sunday, May 8, 2016

U trpasličí planety Makemake objeven souputník

U trpasličí planety Makemake objeven souputník:



Kresba trpasličí planety Makemake a jejího měsíce Autor: NASA, ESA, and A. Parker (Southwest Research Institute)



Měsíc předběžně označený S/2015 (136472) 1 se zkrácenou přezdívkou MK 2, je více než 1300× slabší než mateřská trpasličí planeta Makemake. MK 2 byl spatřen ve vzdálenosti přibližně 20 900 kilometrů od trpasličí planety a jeho průměr byl odhadnut na 160 kilometrů. Průměr Makemake byl již dříve určen na 1 400 kilometrů. Pro trpasličí planetu objevenou v roce 2005 bylo vybráno jméno z mytologie obyvatel Velikonočních ostrovů: Makemake je podle legendy stvořitel lidstva.

Kuiperův pás je rozsáhlý rezervoár pozůstatků zmrzlého materiálu z doby vzniku naší planetární soustavy před 4,5 miliardami roků, a také domov několika trpasličích planet. Některá z těchto těles mají vlastní známé satelity, avšak v tomto případě se jedná o první objev průvodce u trpasličí planety Makemake. Makemake je jednou z pěti trpasličích planet potvrzených Mezinárodní astronomickou unií (IAU).

Pozorování se uskutečnila v dubnu 2015 pomocí kamery Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) na palubě Hubbleova kosmického teleskopu. Unikátní schopnost HST pozorovat velmi slabé útvary v blízkosti jasných objektů, společně s vynikajícím rozlišením, umožňuje astronomům „vyloupnout“ malý měsíc z jasné záře trpasličí planety Makemake. Objev byl oznámen 26. dubna 2016 v cirkuláři Minor Planet Electronic Circular.

Pozorovatelský tým použil stejnou techniku pozorování měsíce pomocí HST, jaká byla použita při pátrání po malých satelitech Pluta v letech 2005, 2011 a 2012. Několik dřívějších pokusů objevit měsíce trpasličí planety Makemake vyznělo naprázdno. Objev měsíce může poskytnout cenné informace o systému trpasličí planety. Na základě změření parametrů měsíční dráhy astronomové mohou vypočítat hmotnost celé soustavy a získat přehled o jejím vývoji. Objev měsíce rovněž posiluje představu, že většina trpasličích planet má svoje měsíce.

Makemake patří do třídy vzácných objektů podobných Plutu, takže objev jejich průvodců je důležitý,“ říká Alex Parker, Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado. „Objev tohoto měsíce nám poskytuje příležitost studovat Makemake v mnohem větším detailu, než bychom byli schopni bez tohoto průvodce.“



Kresba trpasličí planety Makemake a jejího měsíce Autor: NASA, ESA, and A. Parker (Southwest Research Institute)
Kresba trpasličí planety Makemake a jejího měsíce
Autor: NASA, ESA, and A. Parker (Southwest Research Institute)Objev tohoto měsíce jenom zvyšuje paralelu mezi Plutem a Makemake. Obě tělesa mají, jak je dobře známo, povrch pokrytý zmrzlým metanem. Jak bylo již realizováno u Pluta, další výzkum satelitu umožní snadněji určit průměrnou hustotu Makemake, což je klíčové pro zjištění, zda celkové složení Pluta a Makemake je rovněž podobné. „Tento nový objev otevírá novou kapitolu ve srovnávací planetologii ve Sluneční soustavě,“ říká Marc Buie, vedoucí týmu na Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado.

Vědci však potřebují další pozorování pomocí HST k provedení přesných měření, aby zjistili, zda je dráha měsíce eliptická či kruhová. Předběžné odhady napovídají, že v případě kruhové dráhy oběhne měsíc jednou dokola kolem trpasličí planety Makemake za 12 dnů či déle.

Určení tvaru měsíční dráhy pomůže astronomům vyřešit otázku jeho původu. Těsná kruhová dráha znamená, že měsíc MK 2 je pravděpodobně produktem srážky mezi trpasličí planetou Makemake a dalším tělesem Kuiperova pásu. Pokud se měsíc nachází na velmi protáhlé eliptické dráze, je mnohem pravděpodobnější, že se jedná o zachycené těleso Kuiperova pásu. Ať už je původ měsíce jakýkoliv, k události pravděpodobně došlo před několika miliardami roků, když Sluneční soustava byla ještě mladá.

Objev může pomoci vysvětlit jednu záhadu týkající se Makemake. Dřívější výzkumy trpasličí planety v oboru infračerveného záření odhalila, že zatímco povrch Makemake je téměř výhradně světlý a mimořádně studený, některé oblasti se jeví teplejší než jiné plochy. Astronomové předpokládají, že tento nesoulad může být důsledkem slunečního ohřevu oddělených tmavých skvrn na povrchu trpasličí planety. Avšak pokud je Makemake správně orientována, tyto tmavé skvrny by měly přispívat ke změnám jasnosti trpasličí planety v souladu s její rotací. Avšak tato předpokládaná proměnlivost nebyla nikdy pozorována.

Tato dřívější infračervená data neměla dostačující rozlišení k odlišení souputníka MK 2 od trpasličí planety Makemake. Dodatečné analýzy na základě pozorování pomocí HST naznačují, že mnohem teplejší povrch detekovaný dříve v oboru infračerveného záření, možná ve skutečnosti mohl být pouze tmavší povrch průvodce MK 2.

Existuje několik možností, které mohou vysvětlit, jak měsíc získal povrch černý jako uhlí, i když obíhá trpasličí planetu, která je jasná jako čerstvě napadaný sníh. Jedna představa předpokládá, že na rozdíl od velkých objektů jako je Makemake, měsíc MK 2 je natolik malý, že nemůže gravitačně působit na původně světlou ledovou kůru, která sublimuje – mění se z pevného skupenství na plyn – v důsledku slunečního záření. To vytváří z měsíce těleso podobné kometám a dalších objektům Kuiperova pásu, z nichž mnoho je pokryto velmi tmavým materiálem.

Když byl v roce 1978 objeven měsíc Pluta s názvem Charon, astronomové velmi rychle vypočítali hmotnost celé soustavy. Hmotnost Pluta vycházela 100× menší než původně odhadovaná hmotnost v době objevu Pluta v roce 1930. S objevem Charona astronomové znenadání věděli něco, co zcela zásadně změnilo představu o Plutu. To je velká výhoda těles, která mají své souputníky.

Zdroje a doporučené odkazy:
[1] hubblesite.org

Převzato: Hvězdárna Valašské Meziříčí

Maximum meteorického roje Eta Aquarid

Maximum meteorického roje Eta Aquarid:



014483.jpg


Ve čtvrtek 5. května kolem 22h SELČ nastane maximum Eta Aquarid. Maximum není nijak ostré, meteory tohoto roje můžeme pozorovat několik dní před maximem i po něm. V okamžiku maxima bude radiant pod obzorem, vychází až v pátek 6. května ráno, pozorování roje je tedy nejlepší mezi 2. a 4. hodinou ranní (SELČ). V tu dobu můžeme spatřit až 8 meteorů za hodinu. Letos budou pro pozorování ideální podmínky, jelikož Měsíc se bude nacházet ve fázi těsně před novem.


Gas Planet

Gas Planet:

Gas Planet


The SONG and the Hunter

The SONG and the Hunter:

Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.

2016 May 5


See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.


The SONG and the Hunter

Image Credit & Copyright: Mads Fredslund Andersen, Stellar Astrophysics Centre, Aarhus Univ., Denmark


Explanation: Near first quarter, the Moon in March lights this snowy, rugged landscape, a view across the top of Tenerife toward La Palma in the Canary Islands Spanish archipelago. The large Teide volcano, the highest point in Spain, looms over the horizon. Shining above are familiar bright stars of Orion, the Hunter. Adding to the dreamlike scene is the 1 meter diameter prototype telescope of the global network project called the Stellar Observations Network Group or SONG. The SONG's fully robotic observatory was captured during the 30 second exposure while the observatory dome, with slit open, was rotated across the field of view.

Tomorrow's picture: pixels in space



< | Archive | Submissions | Search | Calendar | RSS | Education | About APOD | Discuss | >



Authors & editors: Robert Nemiroff (MTU) & Jerry Bonnell (UMCP)
NASA Official: Phillip Newman Specific rights apply.
NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices
A service of: ASD at NASA / GSFC
& Michigan Tech. U.

NGC 7023: The Iris Nebula

NGC 7023: The Iris Nebula:

Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.

2016 May 6


See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.


NGC 7023: The Iris Nebula

Image Credit & Copyright: Federico Pelliccia


Explanation: These cosmic clouds have blossomed 1,300 light-years away, in the fertile starfields of the constellation Cepheus. Called the Iris Nebula, NGC 7023 is not the only nebula to evoke the imagery of flowers, though. Still, this deep telescopic image shows off the Iris Nebula's range of colors and symmetries, embedded in surrounding fields of interstellar dust. Within the Iris itself, dusty nebular material surrounds a hot, young star. The dominant color of the brighter reflection nebula is blue, characteristic of dust grains reflecting starlight. Central filaments of the reflection nebula glow with a faint reddish photoluminesence as some dust grains effectively convert the star's invisible ultraviolet radiation to visible red light. Infrared observations indicate that this nebula contains complex carbon molecules known as PAHs. The pretty blue petals of the Iris Nebula span about six light-years. The colorful field-of-view stretches almost five Full Moons across the sky.

Tomorrow's picture: light-weekend



< | Archive | Submissions | Search | Calendar | RSS | Education | About APOD | Discuss | >



Authors & editors: Robert Nemiroff (MTU) & Jerry Bonnell (UMCP)
NASA Official: Phillip Newman Specific rights apply.
NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices
A service of: ASD at NASA / GSFC
& Michigan Tech. U.

Three Worlds for TRAPPIST 1

Three Worlds for TRAPPIST 1:

Discover the cosmos! Each day a different image or photograph of our fascinating universe is featured, along with a brief explanation written by a professional astronomer.

2016 May 7



See Explanation. Clicking on the picture will download the highest resolution version available.


Three Worlds for TRAPPIST-1

Illustration Credit: ESO / M. Kornmesser


Explanation: Three new found worlds orbit the ultracool dwarf star TRAPPIST-1, a mere 40 light-years away. Their transits were first detected by the Belgian robotic TRAnsiting Planets and Planetesimals Small Telescope, TRAPPIST, at ESO's La Silla Observatory in Chile. The newly discovered exoplanets are all similar in size to Earth. Because they orbit very close to their faint, tiny star they could also have regions where surface temperatures allow for the presence of liquid water, a key ingredient for life. Their tantalizing proximity to Earth makes them prime candidates for future telescopic explorations of the atmospheres of these potentially habitable planets. All three worlds appear in this artist's vision, an imagined scene near the horizon of the system's outermost planet. Of course, the inner planet is transiting the dim, red, nearly Jupiter-sized parent star.

Tomorrow's picture: an unusual dot on the sun



< | Archive | Submissions | Search | Calendar | RSS | Education | About APOD | Discuss | >



Authors & editors: Robert Nemiroff (MTU) & Jerry Bonnell (UMCP)

NASA Official: Phillip Newman Specific rights apply.

NASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices

A service of: ASD at NASA / GSFC

& Michigan Tech. U.

Saturday, May 7, 2016

How Long Does it Take Mars to Orbit the Sun?

How Long Does it Take Mars to Orbit the Sun?:



Mars from orbit.  Valles Marineris and Volcanic region


Given it's similarities to Earth, Mars is often referred to as "Earth's Twin". Like Earth, Mars is a terrestrial planet, which means it is composed largely of silicate rock and minerals that are differentiated into a core, mantle and crust. It is also located within the Sun's "Goldilocks Zone" (aka. habitable zone), has polar ice caps, and once had flowing water on its surface. But beyond these, Mars and Earth are very different worlds.



In addition to their stark contrasts in temperature, surface conditions, and exposure to harmful radiation, Mars also takes a significantly longer time to complete a single orbit of the Sun. In fact, a year on Mars is almost twice as long as a year here on Earth - lasting 686.971 days, which works out to about 1.88 Earth years. And in the course of that orbit, the planet undergoes some rather interesting changes.



Interestingly enough, what Mars goes through in the course of a Martian year is quite similar to what Earth goes through (yet another thing they have in common). Depending on its distance from the Sun, and which hemisphere is pointed towards it, changes in temperatures and weather occur in one hemisphere or the other. In short, Mars experiences seasonal changes, like Earth, thanks to the tilt of the planet's axis and the eccentricity of its orbit.



Orbital Eccentricity:

Mars orbits our Sun at an average distance (semi-major axis) of 227,939,200 km, which is roughly 1.5 times the distance between the Sun and Earth (1.523679 AU). However, during the course of its 686.971 day orbital period, its distance from the Sun changes considerably. During the course of a Martian year, the planet's orbit ranges in distance from 206,700,000 km (1.3814 AU) at perihelion to 249,200,000 km (1.666 AU) at aphelion.







This amounts to an orbital eccentricity of about 0.09, which is more pronounced than any other planet in the Solar System ( except for Mercury which has an eccentricity of 0.20563). However, it is understood that this was not always the case. In fact, roughly 1.35 million years ago, Mars' orbit was nearly circular, with an eccentricity of just 0.002.



What's more, for the past 35,000 years, the orbit of Mars has been getting slightly more eccentric because of the gravitational effects of the other planets. It reached a minimum eccentricity of 0.079 some 19,000 years ago, and will peak at about 0.105 in about 24,000 years from now. In 1,000,000 years from now, its eccentricity will be close to what it is now again - with an estimated eccentricity of 0.01.



Every 780 days (779.94 to be precise), Earth and Mars achieve their closest distance. This occurs roughly 8.5 days after Mars reaches opposition, when there is a 180° difference between the geocentric longitudes of it and the Sun and the Earth passes between them. This is the closest Mars ever gets to Earth, at a distance of about 56 million km, making it the ideal time for sending exploration missions (which would take 8 months to arrive, rather than several years).



A sidereal day, the amount of time it takes for Mars to complete a single rotation on its axis, is roughly 24 hours, 37 minutes, and 22 seconds. Meanwhile, a solar day (or Sol) on Mars - i.e. the amount of time it takes for the Sun to return to the same place in the sky - lasts 24 hours, 39 minutes, and 35.244 seconds. As such, a Martian year is equivalent to 668.5991 Sols.







Seasonal Changes:

Mars' axis is titled at 25.19 degrees relative to its orbital plane, which is similar to the axial tilt of Earth (23.44 degrees). As a result, Mars has seasons like Earth. Except that on Mars, they are nearly twice as long because its orbital period is that much longer. In the northern hemisphere, spring is the longest season, lasting roughly 7 Earth months out of the year. Summer is second, lasting six months, while Fall lasts 5.3 months and Winter is just over 4 months. In the south, the length of the seasons is only slightly different.



Mars' orbital eccentricity is also a major factor when it comes to the planet's seasonal cycles. It is near perihelion when it is summer in the southern hemisphere and winter in the north, and near aphelion when it is winter in the southern hemisphere and summer in the north. As a result, the seasons in the southern hemisphere are more extreme and the seasons in the northern are milder. The summer temperatures in the south can be up to 30 K (30 °C; 54 °F) warmer than the equivalent summer temperatures in the north.



Mars also has the largest dust storms in the Solar System. These can vary from a storm over a small area, to gigantic storms (thousands of km in diameter) that cover the entire planet and obscure the surface from view. They tend to occur when Mars is closest to the Sun, and have been shown to increase the global temperature.







The planet’s average temperature is -46 °C (-51 °F), with a low of -143 °C (-225.4 °F) during the winter at the poles, and a high of 35 °C (95 °F) during summer and midday at the equator. This works out to a variation in average surface temperature that is quite similar to Earth's - a difference of 178 °C (320.4 °F) versus 145.9 °C (262.5 °F).



All told, Mars has a lot in common with Earth. At the same time, it has several key differences. Knowing what these are and how to address them will be crucial when it comes time to mount crewed missions to Mars, not to mention building permanent settlements there.



We have written many interesting articles about Mars here at Universe Today. Here’s How Strong Is The Gravity On Mars?, How Long Does It Take To Get To Mars?, How Long Is A Day On Mars?, Mars Compared To Earth, How Can We Live On Mars?



Astronomy Cast also has several good episodes on the subject – Episode 52: Mars, Episode 92: Missions to Mars – Part 1, and Episode 94: Humans to Mars, Part 1 – Scientists.



For more information, check out NASA’s Solar System Exploration page on Mars and NASA’s Journey to Mars.

The post How Long Does it Take Mars to Orbit the Sun? appeared first on Universe Today.

The Constellation Auriga

The Constellation Auriga:



The northern constellation Auriga, showing the brightest stars of Capella, Menkalinan, and proximate Deep Sky Objects. Credit: stargazerslounge.com


Welcome back to Constellation Friday! Today, in honor of our dear friend and contributor, Tammy Plotner, we examine the Auriga constellation. Enjoy!



In the 2nd century CE, Greek-Egyptian astronomer Claudius Ptolemaeus (aka. Ptolemy) compiled a list of the then-known 48 constellations. His treatise, known as the Almagest, would serve as the authoritative source of astronomy for over a thousand years to come. Since the development of modern telescopes and astronomy, this list has come to be expanded to include the 88 constellation that are recognized by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) today.



One of these is the constellation of Auriga, a beautiful pentagon-shaped collection of stars that is situated just north of the celestial equator. Along with five other constellations that have stars in the Winter Hexagon asterism, Auriga is most prominent during winter evenings in the Northern Hemisphere. Auriga also belongs to the Perseus family of constellations, together with Andromeda, Cassiopeia, Cepheus, Cetus, Lacerta, Pegasus, Perseus, and Triangulum.







Name and Meaning:

The name Auriga is derived from Latin, and means "the charioteer". Auriga is associated with many characters out of Greek mythology, the foremost of which is the mythological hero Erichthonius of Athens, the son of Hephaestus who was raised by the goddess Athena. Erichthonius was generally credited as being the inventor of the quadriga (the four-horse chariot) which Erichthonius used in the battle that made him king of Athens. In honor of his ingenuity and heroic deeds, Zeus raised him into the heavens, where he rode a chariot resembling the Sun's chariot.







Auriga is also described sometimes as Myrtilus, the son of Hermes and the charioteer of Oenamaus - a Greek god who was himself the son of Ares. This association is supported by depictions of the constellation which rarely show a chariot, as Myrtilus's chariot was destroyed in a race intended to win the heart of Oenomaus's daughter (Hippodamia). After being killed by a competing suitor, Myrtilus father Hermes placed him in the sky.



Yet another mythological association is Theseus's son Hippolytus, who was ejected from Athens after he refused the romantic advances of his stepmother Phaedra. He was killed when his chariot was wrecked, but revived by Asclepius. Regardless of Auriga's specific representation, it is likely that the constellation was created by the ancient Greeks to commemorate the importance of the chariot in their society.



Notable Features:

Auriga's brightest star (Alpha Auriga) is Capella, which also happens to be the sixth brightest star in the night sky (magnitude 0.08). A spectroscopic binary that consists of two yellow giant stars (the primary a G-type star, the secondary a G-type giant) Capella is 43 light-years away from Earth. It's traditional name is a reference to its mythological position as Amalthea, the mythological she-goat from Greek mythology. It's Arabic name (al-'Ayyuq) also translates to "the goat", and its Sumerian name (mul.ÁŠ.KAR) means "the goat star".



Beta Aurigae (Menkalinan, Menkarlina) is a bright A-type subgiant. It's Arabic name comes from the phrase mankib dhu al-'inan, which means "shoulder of the charioteer". Menkalinan is an eclipsing binary star made up of two blue-white stars that are 81 light-years from Earth. The double nature of this star was discovered in 1890 through spectroscopic analysis, which made it the second spectroscopic binary to be discovered.







Other bright stars include Gamma Aurigae, a B-type giant that has since been reclassified as belonging to the Taurus constellation - making it Beta Taurid. Iota Aurigae (aka. Hasseleh and Kabdhilinan) is a K-type giant that is located 494 light-years away from Earth. The traditional name of Kabdhilinan, sometimes shortened to "Alkab", is taken from the Arabic phrase al-kab dh'il inan, which means "shoulder of the rein holder".



Delta Aurigae, the northernmost bright star in Auriga, is another K-type giant that 126 light-years from Earth. Though it is often listed as a single star, it actually has three very widely spaced optical companions. One is a double star of magnitude 11, two arcminutes from Delta, and the other is a star of magnitude 10, three arcminutes from Delta.



Then there's Eta Aurigae, a blue-white B-type main sequence dwarf located about 219 light years away. In the constellation, the star represents one of the ‘kids’ of the goat (Capella) held by the Charioteer. Its traditional name is Haedus II (or Hoedus II) and it comes from the Latin word haedus, which means ‘kid.’ It is occasionally called Mahasim (“wrist”), a name it shares with Theta Aurigae.



Lambda Aurigae (Al Hurr) is a G-type star that is between a subgiant and main-sequence and located 41 light-years from Earth. Though older than the Sun, it is similar in many ways, which includes its mass (1.07 solar masses) and its radius (1.3 solar radii), and a rotational period of 26 days. However, it differs from the Sun in its metallicity, as its iron content is 1.15 times that of the Sun, though it has relatively less nitrogen and carbon.







Zeta Aurigae is the other ‘kid’ held by the Charioteer. The star is also commonly called Sadatoni. The name comes from the Arabic phrase als-saeid alth-thani, which means “the second arm (of the Charioteer).” Sadatoni is an eclipsing binary star 790 light years distant. It consists of a red supergiant and a B8 type companion. The system’s magnitude varies between 3.61 and 3.99 with a period of 972 days.



There are also five stars with confirmed planetary systems in Auriga, not to mention a white dwarf with a suspected planetary system. These include HD 40979, which has one planet - HD 40979 b. It was discovered in 2002 using radial velocity measurements on the parent star. With a mass of 3.83 Jupiter masses, the planet orbits its parent star with a semi-major axis of 0.83 AU and a period of 263.1 days.



Another is HD 45350, which also has one planet, known as HD 45350 b. This world has 1.79 Jupiter masses and orbits its parent star every 890.76 days at a distance of 1.92 AU. It was discovered in 2004, also through the use of the radial velocity method. HD 43691 also has a confirmed exoplanet; HD 43691 b, a planet with 2.49 Jupiter masses that orbits its parent star at a distance of 0.24 AU with a period of just 36.96 days.



HD 49674 is yet another star in Auriga that has a planet orbiting it. Much like the others, HD 49674 b was detected in 2002 using the radial velocity method. Unlike the others, it is quite small, with a mass that is 0.115 times that of Jupiter. It also orbits very close to its star, at 0.058 AU, and has a orbital period of just 4.94 days.







The most recently confirmed exoplanet in Auriga is HAT-P-9-b, which was detected using the transit method in 2008. It also orbits very close to its parent star (HAT-9-P), at a distance of 0.053 AU and with a period of 3.92 days. This world has been classified as a "hot Jupiter", with a mass that is 0.67 times that of Jupiter but a radius that is 1.4 times as large.



Auriga contains three Messier objects - M36 (NGC 1960), M37 (NGC 2099), and M38 (NGC 1912) - and numerous star clusters. It also has four meteor showers associated with it - the Alpha Aurigids, the Delta Aurigids, the fainter Aurigids, and the Zeta Aurigids.



History of Observation:

The first recorded mention of Auriga's stars comes from Mesopotamia, where it was called GAM and included most of the stars from the modern constellation. This figure was alternatively called Gamlum or MUL.GAM in the MUL.APIN - the Babylonian astrological catalog. The constellation represented either a scimitar or a crook, the latter of which stood for a goat-herd or shepherd.



This tradition was carried on by Bedouin astronomers, who created constellations that were named in accordance with groups of animals. To them, the stars of Auriga comprised a herd of goats, an association which was carried on by the Greek astronomical tradition (which endured even after it became associated with the charioteer).



In ancient Chinese astronomy, the stars of Auriga were incorporated into several Chinese constellations. These included Wuche, which used several of Auriga's stars to represent the five chariots of the celestial emperors, which in turn represented the grain harvest. Another is Zuoqi, which was made up of nine stars in the east of the constellation to represent chairs for the emperor and other officials.







Auriga's brightest star, Capella, was also significant to many cultures. In ancient Hindu astronomy, Capella represented the heart of Brahma, while ancient Peruvian peoples saw Capella (which they called Colca) as a star intimately connected to the affairs of shepherds. Capella was also significant to the Aztec people, which is evidenced by the archaeological site of Monte Albán, a Late Classic settlement that contained a marker for the star's heliacal rising.



To the indigenous peoples of California and Nevada, the bright pattern of the constellation was also significant. To them, Auriga's brightest stars formed a curve that was represented in crescent-shaped petroglyphs. The indigenous Pawnee of North America recognized a constellation with the same major stars as modern Auriga: Alpha, Beta, Gamma (Beta Tauri), Theta, and Iota Aurigae.



To the northern Inuit, a constellation that included Capella and other bright stars from Auriga were known as Quturjuuk, meaning "collar-bones". Its rising signaled that the constellation Aagjuuk, which was made up of stars from the constellation Aquila, would be rising soon. Since Aagjuuk represented the dawn following the winter solstice, and was used for navigation and time-keeping at night, it was extremely important to the Inuit.



Since the time of Ptolemy, Auriga has remained a constellation and is officially recognized by the International Astronomical Union today. Like all modern constellations, it is now defined as a specific region of the sky that includes both the ancient pattern and the surrounding stars. In 1922, the IAU designated its recommended three-letter abbreviation, "Aur", and the official boundaries of Auriga were created in 1930 by Eugène Delporte.







Finding Auriga:

While viewing Auriga's stars, pay particular attention to yellow giant Alpha Aurigae, aka. Capella. It is the 6th brightest star in the sky (0.08 magnitude) and also a spectroscopic binary consisting of a G5III and a G0III that revolve each other every 104 days. Menkalinen, or Beta Aurigae, is also a spectroscopic binary. However, it rotates far faster, completing its circuit in just four days! This eclipsing binary pair makes the brightness of Beta vary.



Epsilon Aurigae is also an eclipsing binary, but one that has an extraordinarily long period of 27.1 years. While it only drops by 0.8 of a magnitude, it's dark companion is a 10-12 solar mass black hole. According to studies done by Wilson and Cameron a ring of obscuring material surrounds the black hole and accounts for the magnitude drop. Don't skip Zeta Aurigae, either. It's a K4 giant that's also an eclipsing binary. It has a B8 main sequence star which revolves around it in less than 3 years.



Those who have telescopes will be interested to know that some of Auriga's other binaries can be resolved. Double star Omega Auriga can be split with small telescopes, thus allowing stargazers to see both its 5th and a 8th magnitude stars. Or try disparate double Theta Aurigae - it's a 2.62 primary and a 7.0 secondary.



For those using binoculars, the splendid Milky Way star field is rich with open clusters that are easily spotted are resolved. Open cluster M36 is a nice compression and contains about 60 stars to a small telescope. The slightly egg-shaped M38 is another easy binocular target, a very rich open cluster that is easily viewed using any instrument. For telescopes, do not overlook IC 410. This diffuse nebula with a cluster of stars is more commonly known as the "Flaming Star".







When it comes to meteor showers, the Aurigids become active between January 31st, and February 23rd and are known for sporadic bright fireballs. From August 25th through September 6th, the Alpha Aurigid meteor stream is active, with an average fall rate of about 9 meteors per hour (but outbursts of up to 30 were observed in 1935 and 1986). The Delta Aurigid meteor stream becomes active between September 22nd and October 23rd. A good time to look for peak activity for this branch is during the week beginning on October 6th through the 15th.



As always, we wish you luck in your stargazing. And know that when you find this constellation, you are looking upon an asterism that people have been designating and characterizing since time immemorial!



We have written many interesting articles about the constellation here at Universe Today. Here is What Are The Constellations?What Is The Zodiac?, and Zodiac Signs And Their Dates.



Be sure to check out The Messier Catalog while you’re at it!



For more information, check out the IAUs list of Constellations, and the Students for the Exploration and Development of Space page on Aries and Constellation Families.

The post The Constellation Auriga appeared first on Universe Today.

Enceladus’ Jets Selectively Power-Up Farther From Saturn

Enceladus’ Jets Selectively Power-Up Farther From Saturn:



Icy water vapor geysers erupting from fissures on Enceladus. Credit: NASA/JPL


A crowning achievement of the Cassini mission to Saturn is the discovery of water vapor jets spraying out from Enceladus' southern pole. First witnessed by the spacecraft in 2005, these icy geysers propelled the little 515-kilometer-wide moon into the scientific spotlight and literally rewrote the mission's objectives. After 22 flybys of Enceladus during its nearly twelve years in orbit around Saturn, Cassini has gathered enough data to determine that there is a global subsurface ocean of salty liquid water beneath Enceladus' frozen crust—an ocean that gets sprayed into space from long "tiger stripe" fissures running across the moon's southern pole.  Now, new research has shown that at least some of the vapor jets get a boost in activity when Enceladus is farther from Saturn.







By measuring the changes in brightness of a distant background star as Enceladus' plumes passed in front of it in March 2016, Cassini observed a significant increase in the amount of icy particles being ejected by one particular jet source.







Named "Baghdad 1," the jet went from contributing 2% of the total vapor content of the entire plume area to 8% when Enceladus was at the farthest point in its slightly-eccentric orbit around Saturn. This small yet significant discovery indicates that, although Enceladus' plumes are reacting to morphological changes to the moon's crust due to tidal flexing, it's select small-scale jets that are exhibiting the most variation in output (rather than a simple, general increase in outgassing across the full plumes.)



“How do the tiger stripe fissures respond to the push and pull of tidal forces as Enceladus goes around its orbit to explain this difference? We now have new clues!” said Candice Hansen, senior scientist at the Planetary Science Institute and lead planner of the study. “It may be that the individual jet sources along the tiger stripes have a particular shape or width that responds most strongly to the tidal forcing each orbit to boost more ice grains at this orbital longitude.”



The confirmation that Enceladus shows an increase in overall plume output at farther points from Saturn was first made in 2013.



Whether this new finding means that the internal structure of the fissures is different than what scientists have suspected or some other process is at work either within Enceladus or in its orbit around Saturn still remains to be determined.



"Since we can only see what's going on above the surface, at the end of the day, it's up to the modelers to take this data and figure out what's going on underground," said Hansen.



Sources: Planetary Science Institute and NASA/JPL





The post Enceladus’ Jets Selectively Power-Up Farther From Saturn appeared first on Universe Today.

Thursday, May 5, 2016

Can We Now Predict When A Neutron Star Will Give Birth To A Black Hole?

Can We Now Predict When A Neutron Star Will Give Birth To A Black Hole?:



New research indicates that it may now be possible to predict when a neutron star will collapse to form a new black hole. Credit and Copyright: Paramount Pictures/Warner Bros.


A neutron star is perhaps one of the most awe-inspiring and mysterious things in the Universe. Composed almost entirely of neutrons with no net electrical charge, they are the final phase in the life-cycle of a giant star, born of the fiery explosions known as supernovae. They are also the densest known objects in the universe, a fact which often results in them becoming a black hole if they undergo a change in mass.For some time, astronomers have been confounded by this process, never knowing where or when a neutron star might make this final transformation. But thanks to a recent study by a team of researchers from Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany, it may now be possible to determine the absolute maximum mass that is required for a neutron star to collapse, giving birth to a new black hole.As with everything else relating to neutron stars, the process by which they become black holes has long been a source of fascination and bewilderment for astronomers. As the densest of all objects in the known universe, their mass cannot grow without bound - meaning that any increase in mass will also cause an increase in their density.Normally, this process will cause a neutron star to simply achieve a new state of equilibrium, or will result in a non-rotating neutron star beginning to  spin. This latter effect will allow it to remain stable for longer than it could otherwise, since the additional centrifugal force can help to balance out the intense gravitational force at work in its interior.However, even this process cannot last forever. As Professor Luciano Rezzolla of Goethe University told Universe Today via email:

"If the star is nonrotating, then this mass is not too difficult to compute and is called the maximum nonrotating mass, or M_TOV. However, this is not the largest mass possible because if the star is rotating, it can sustain more mass than if is not rotating. Even in this case, however, there is a limit because there is a limit to how much a star can rotate before being broken apart from the centrifugal force. Hence, the absolute largest mass that a neutron star can achieve is known as the "maximum mass of a maximally rotating configuration", M_max.  This is the largest possible mass of the most rapidly rotating model. Suppose you have built such a model: if you added a single atom onto it, it would collapse to a black hole, while it would break apart if you spun it a bit more."
As neutron stars accumulate mass, the speed of their rotation will increase; and here too, there is a limit. Basically, sooner or later, a neutron star will reach its absolute maximum mass and beyond this, it will inevitably collapse in on itself to become a black hole. Unfortunately, in the past, astronomers have had a hard time determining what the value of this limit was.The reason for this is because such a maximum value is dependent on the equation of state of the matter composing the star. This thermodynamic equation describes the state of matter under a given set of physical conditions - i.e. temperature, pressure, volume, or internal energy. And while astronomers have been able to ascertain within a degree of certainty what the maximum mass of a nonrotating neutron stars would be, they have been less successful in calculating what the maximum mass is for those that are rotating.In short, they have been unable to determine how much mass is needed before a rotating neutron star will surpass its maximum speed of rotation and finally form a new black hole. As Rezzolla explained:

"What made it difficult in the past to calculate M_max is its value will differ from what composes the neutron star (i.e. its "equation of state") and this is something we don't really know. Neutron-star matter is so different from the one we know that we can only make educated guesses; and unfortunately, there are many guesses because there are several different ways to compute the properties of the equation of state. So one ended up up with a situation in which not only the maximum mass was different for different equations of state, but even the maximum rotation speed was different for different equations of state."
However, in their study, titled "Maximum mass, moment of inertia and compactness of relativistic stars" - which appeared recently in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society - Rezzolla and Cosima Breu (a Masters student in theoretical physics at Goethe University and co-author of the study) argue that it may now be possible to infer what the maximum mass of a rapidly rotating star would be.For the sake of their research, Rezzolla and Breu relied on recent work by astronomers that has shown that it is possible to express the properties of stellar equilibrium configurations that does not depend on the specific equation of the state of their mass. In short, these studies have shown that there are certain "universal relations" when it comes to the equilibrium of stars.As a result, they were able to show that it is possible to predict the maximum mass a rapidly rotating neutron star can attain by simply considering what the maximum mass is of a neutron star in a corresponding, non-rotating configuration. But as Rezzolla indicated, even with these data sets available, what was needed was a fresh perspective:

"Universal relations simply state that objects that are apparently different actually share many things in common. For example, although we are different from other mammals, say pigs, our genome has a huge amount of common features, essentially because we have to synthesize the same proteins, breath the same air, etc. Hence, if we learn of hemoglobin actually works for one mammal, we have learned for many more mammals. This seems to happen also for neutron stars so that although there are many equations of state that predict different results for M_max, they all show there is a universal relation between M_max and M_TOV. More specifically, we have found that M_max = (1.203 +- 0.022) M_TOV."
These findings are likely to have interesting implications when it comes to future astronomical research. For starters, knowing the maximum mass a neutron star can achieve will be useful when analyzing the gravitational-wave signals produced by neutron stars, allowing astronomers to extract information on the equation of state before the object collapses into a black hole.Second, it will be useful in determining the moment of inertia for neutron stars, i.e. knowing how much mass is required before it begins to rotate. In short, scientists will be able to know with greater accuracy what it takes to set a neutron star to spinning and will able to predict with greater accuracy when a spinning neutron star will be on the verge of collapsing, and thus knowing when and where a new black hole will be.Al this, in turn, is likely to be a boon for research into black holes, the one object in the universe that is arguably more awe-inspiring and less understood than neutron stars. One step closer to understanding this grand, mysterious thing known as the Universe!Further Reading: phys.org 

The post Can We Now Predict When A Neutron Star Will Give Birth To A Black Hole? appeared first on Universe Today.

When Will Earth Lock to the Moon?

When Will Earth Lock to the Moon?:

We always see the same side of the Moon. It’s always up there, staring down at us with its terrifying visage. Or maybe it’s a creepy rabbit? Anyway, it’s always showing us the same face, and never any other part.

This is because the Moon is tidally locked to the Earth; the same fate that affects every single large moon orbiting a planet. The Moon is locked to the Earth, the Jovian moons are locked to Jupiter, Titan is locked to Saturn, etc.

As the Moon orbits the Earth, it slowly rotates to keep the same hemisphere facing us. Its day is as long as its year. And standing on the surface of the Moon, you’d see the Earth in roughly the same spot in the sky. Forever and ever.

Forever and ever and ever... unless we finally manage to destroy the Moon. Credit: NASA/Goddard/Arizona State University
Because of tidal locking, you’d see Earth in roughly the same spot from the Moon forever. For-eh-ver. For-EH-VER. Credit: NASA / Goddard / Arizona State University
We see this all across the Solar System.

But there’s one place where this tidal locking goes to the next level: the dwarf planet Pluto and its large moon Charon are tidally locked to each other. In other words, the same hemisphere of Pluto always faces Charon and vice versa.

It take Pluto about 6 and a half days for the Sun to return to the same point in the sky, which is the same time it takes Charon to complete an orbit, which is the same time it takes the Sun to pass through the sky on Charon.

Since Pluto eventually locked to its moon, can the same thing happen here on Earth. Will we eventually lock with the Moon?

Before we answer this question, let’s explain what’s going on here. Although the Earth and the Moon are spheres, they actually have a little variation. The gravity pulling on each world creates love handle tidal bulges on each world.

And these bulges act like a brake, slowing down the rotation of the world. Because the Earth has 81 times the mass of the Moon, it was the dominant force in this interaction.

In the early Solar System, both the Earth and the Moon rotated independently. But the Earth’s gravity grabbed onto those love handles and slowed down the rotation of the Moon. To compensate for the loss of momentum in the system, the Moon drifted away from the Earth to its current position, about 370,000 kilometers away.

But Moon has the same impact on the Earth. The same tidal forces that cause the tides on Earth are slowing down the Earth’s rotation bit by bit. And the Moon is continuing to drift away a few centimeters a year to compensate.

It’s hard to estimate exactly when, but over the course of tens of billions of years, the Earth will become locked to the Moon, just like Pluto and Charon.

Pluto and Charon are tidally locked to each other. Credit: NASA/JHUAPL/SwRI
Pluto and Charon are tidally locked to each other. Credit: NASA / JHUAPL / SwRI
Of course, this will be long after the Sun has died as a red giant. And there’s no way to know what kind of mayhem that’ll cause to the Earth-Moon system. Other planets in the Solar System may shift around, and maybe even eject the Earth into space, taking the Moon with it.

What about the Sun? Is it possible for the Earth to eventually lock gravitationally to the Sun?

Astronomers have found extrasolar planets orbiting other stars which are tidally locked. But they’re extremely close, well within the orbit of Mercury.

Here in our Solar System, we’re just too far away from the Sun for the Earth to lock to it. The gravitational influence of the other planets like Venus, Mars and Jupiter perturb our orbit and keep us from ever locking. Without any other planets in the Solar System, though, and with a Sun that would last forever, it would be an inevitability.

It is theoretically possible that the Earth will tidally lock to the Moon in about 50 billion years or so. Assuming the Earth and Moon weren’t consumed during the Sun’s red giant phase. I guess we’ll have to wait and see.

The post When Will Earth Lock to the Moon? appeared first on Universe Today.

The Laws Of Cosmology May Need A Re-Write

The Laws Of Cosmology May Need A Re-Write:



A map of the CMB as captured by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe. Credit: WMAP team


Something's up in cosmology that may force us to re-write a few textbooks. It's all centred around the measurement of the expansion of the Universe, which is, obviously, a pretty key part of our understanding of the cosmos.The expansion of the Universe is regulated by two things: Dark Energy and Dark Matter. They're like the yin and yang of the cosmos. One drives expansion, while one puts the brakes on expansion. Dark Energy pushes the universe to continually expand, while Dark Matter provides the gravity that retards that expansion. And up until now, Dark Energy has appeared to be a constant force, never wavering.How is this known? Well, the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is one way the expansion is measured. The CMB is like an echo from the early days of the Universe. It's the evidence left behind from the moment about 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the rate of expansion of the Universe stabilized. The CMB is the source for most of what we know of Dark Energy and Dark Matter. (You can hear the CMB for yourself by turning on a household radio, and tuning into static. A small percentage of that static is from the CMB. It's like listening to the echo of the Big Bang.)The CMB has been measured and studied pretty thoroughly, most notably by the ESA's Planck Observatory, and by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP). The Planck, in particular, has given us a snapshot of the early Universe that has allowed cosmologists to predict the expansion of the Universe. But our understanding of the expansion of the Universe doesn't just come from studying the CMB, but also from the Hubble Constant.The Hubble Constant is named after Edwin Hubble, an American astronomer who observed that the expansion velocity of galaxies can be confirmed by their redshift. Hubble also observed Cepheid variable stars, a type of standard candle that gives us reliable measurements of distances between galaxies. Combining the two observations, the velocity and the distance, yielded a measurement for the expansion of the Universe.So we've had two ways to measure the expansion of the Universe, and they mostly agree with each other. There've been discrepancies between the two of a few percentage points, but that has been within the realm of measurement errors.But now something's changed.In a new paper, Dr. Adam Riess of Johns Hopkins University, and his team, have reported a more stringent measurement of the expansion of the Universe. Riess and his team used the Hubble Space Telescope to observe 18 standard candles in their host galaxies, and have reduced some of the uncertainty inherent in past studies of standard candles.The result of this more accurate measurement is that the Hubble constant has been refined. And that, in turn, has increased the difference between the two ways the expansion of the Universe is measured. The gap between what the Hubble constant tells us is the rate of expansion, and what the CMB, as measured by the Planck spacecraft, tells us is the rate of expansion, is now 8%. And 8% is too large a discrepancy to be explained away as measurement error.The fallout from this is that we may need to revise our standard model of cosmology to account for this, somehow. And right now, we can only guess what might need to be changed. There are at least a couple candidates, though.It might be centred around Dark Matter, and how it behaves. It's possible that Dark Matter is affected by a force in the Universe that doesn't act on anything else. Since so little is known about Dark Matter, and the name itself is little more than a placeholder for something we are almost completely ignorant about, that could be it.Or, it could be something to do with Dark Energy. Its name, too, is really just a placeholder for something we know almost nothing about. Maybe Dark Energy is not constant, as we have thought, but changes over time to become stronger now than in the past. That could account for the discrepancy.A third possibility is that standard candles are not the reliable indicators of distance that we thought they were. We've refined our measurements of standard candles before, maybe we will again.Where this all leads is open to speculation at this point. The rate of expansion of the Universe has changed before; about 7.5 billion years ago it accelerated. Maybe it's changing again, right now in our time. Since Dark Energy occupies so-called empty space, maybe more of it is being created as expansion continues. Maybe we're reaching another tipping or balancing point.The only thing certain is that it is a mystery. One that we are driven to understand.

The post The Laws Of Cosmology May Need A Re-Write appeared first on Universe Today.